lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:32:03 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: arnd@...db.de Cc: jaswinder@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Confusion in usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:24:25 +0100 > I think we should simply define a macro for use in the kernel, e.g. in > <asm/types.h>. There already is a BITS_PER_LONG macro in there, maybe > we can add an exported __BITS_PER_LONG there that checks for the right > macro on each architecture. That might work. > On parisc, there is a major confusion in this area, at some point, all > checks for __LP64__ got replaced with CONFIG_64BIT there. While I have > not understood what the problem with __LP64__ was, the check for > CONFIG_64BIT on parisc user space looks very wrong. Yep. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists