linux-kernel - Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:59:13 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:24:22AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Right, so you need to use internal xfs sync functions that don't
> have these problems. That is:
> 
> 	error = xfs_sync_inodes(ip->i_mount, SYNC_DELWRI|SYNC_WAIT);
> 
> will do a blocking flush of all the inodes without deadlocks occurring.
> Then you can remove the 500ms wait.

I've given this a try with Eric's testcase from #724 in the oss bugzilla,
but it's not enough yet.  I thinks that's because SYNC_WAIT is rather
meaningless for data writeout, and we need SYNC_IOWAIT instead.  The
patch below gets the testcase working for me:


Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-01-22 06:29:30.646141628 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-01-22 21:57:53.073864570 +0100
@@ -446,7 +446,9 @@ xfs_flush_device_work(
 	void		*arg)
 {
 	struct inode	*inode = arg;
-	sync_blockdev(mp->m_super->s_bdev);
+
+	xfs_sync_inodes(mp, SYNC_DELWRI);
+	xfs_sync_inodes(mp, SYNC_DELWRI | SYNC_IOWAIT);
 	iput(inode);
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/