linux-kernel - Re: [patch 24/46] r6040: bump release number to 0.19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:49:33 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jj@...osbits.net
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	jmforbes@...uxtx.org, zwane@....linux.org.uk, tytso@....edu,
	rdunlap@...otime.net, davej@...hat.com, chuckw@...ntumlinux.com,
	reviews@...cw.f00f.org, mkrufky@...uxtv.org, cebbert@...hat.com,
	cavokz@...il.com, w@....eu, rbranco@...checkpoint.com,
	jake@....net, eteo@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	florian@...nwrt.org
Subject: Re: [patch 24/46] r6040: bump release number to 0.19

From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:31:22 +0100 (CET)

> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > 2.6.28-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> > 
> 
> It's simple enough, sure, but it doesn't really conform to the guidelines 
> set out for -stable patches in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt : 

We went over this two release ago.

Version bumps for drivers are fine.

Please bring this up again and again every time you see it in the
future too, thanks. :-/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/