lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:40:42 +0530
From:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
To:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc:	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: hdb: status error: error=0x40 <3>{ UncorrectableError }

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> wrote:
>
>
> Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:09:56 +0530
>> Jaswinder Singh Rajput
>> <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I added extra IDE drive I get similar messages like below so I replace
>>> it another drive but I am still getting similar error messages on
>>> 2.6.29-rc2-tip:
>>>
>>> hdb: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest
>>> Error }
>>> hdb: status error: error=0x40 <3>{ UncorrectableError },
>>> LBAsect=208845, sector=0
>>
>> Uncorrectable Error is an error from the drive, not the kernel. Looks
>> like you have bad sectors on that drive.
>>
> He noted that he tried another drive, so unless he has a pile of bad drives
> it's probably something else. Being "hdb" may indicate that it's connected
> to the same controller as "hda" and might not be jumpered for slave. Or it
> might be a bad cable, a controller which doesn't like two drives, a dubious
> power connector, etc. Or if he doesn't have an hda, perhaps the kernel
> doesn't like a secondary drive without a primary.
>
> Being hdb instead of sdb with a new kernel indicates he is using a config
> which may get a lot less testing these days, perhaps?
>
> In any case, I doubt he had two bad drives, so something else is more
> likely.
>

But earlier both was working fine on some another machines.

--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ