| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:54:22 -0800
From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
BARRE Sebastien <sbarre@...lcc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 13:06 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> I have two patch format issues:
>
> - Always put a line of whitespace after variable
> declarations.
>
> - Include text like the above as part of the patch,
> even if you're stuck with a mailer that mangles
> non-attached text.
>
> You're using Evolution, which is mentioned in the
> Documentation/email-clients.txt file as having a
> way (albeit awkward) to send normal patch email.
>
> Given those changes:
>
> Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>
> Thanks.
Thanks for the feedback. Here you go:
Allow the rtc-ds1307 driver to work with SMBus controllers like nforce2
that do not support i2c block transfers.
Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
Index: linux-2.6.27.4/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27.4.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ linux-2.6.27.4/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ struct ds1307 {
struct i2c_client *client;
struct rtc_device *rtc;
struct work_struct work;
+ s32 (*read_block_data)(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values);
+ s32 (*write_block_data)(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, const u8 *values);
};
struct chip_desc {
@@ -132,6 +136,79 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ds1307_id);
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+#define BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES 10
+
+static s32 ds1307_read_block_data_once(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values)
+{
+ s32 i, data;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ data = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, command + i);
+ if (data < 0)
+ return data;
+ values[i] = data;
+ }
+ return i;
+}
+
+static s32 ds1307_read_block_data(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, u8 *values)
+{
+ u8 oldvalues[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
+ s32 ret;
+ int tries = 0;
+
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ds1307_read_block_data (length=%d)\n", length);
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length, values);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ do {
+ if (++tries > BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "ds1307_read_block_data failed\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ memcpy(oldvalues, values, length);
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length,
+ values);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } while (memcmp(oldvalues, values, length));
+ return length;
+}
+
+static s32 ds1307_write_block_data(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command,
+ u8 length, const u8 *values)
+{
+ u8 currvalues[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
+ int tries = 0;
+
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ds1307_write_block_data (length=%d)\n", length);
+ do {
+ s32 i, ret;
+
+ if (++tries > BLOCK_DATA_MAX_TRIES) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "ds1307_write_block_data failed\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, command + i,
+ values[i]);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ ret = ds1307_read_block_data_once(client, command, length,
+ currvalues);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } while (memcmp(currvalues, values, length));
+ return length;
+}
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
/*
* The IRQ logic includes a "real" handler running in IRQ context just
* long enough to schedule this workqueue entry. We need a task context
@@ -202,7 +279,7 @@ static int ds1307_get_time(struct device
int tmp;
/* read the RTC date and time registers all at once */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client,
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client,
DS1307_REG_SECS, 7, ds1307->regs);
if (tmp != 7) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "read", tmp);
@@ -279,7 +356,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_time(struct device
"write", buf[0], buf[1], buf[2], buf[3],
buf[4], buf[5], buf[6]);
- result = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 7, buf);
+ result = ds1307->write_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 7, buf);
if (result < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "write", result);
return result;
@@ -297,7 +374,7 @@ static int ds1307_read_alarm(struct devi
return -EINVAL;
/* read all ALARM1, ALARM2, and status registers at once */
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->read_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, ds1307->regs);
if (ret != 9) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "alarm read", ret);
@@ -356,7 +433,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_alarm(struct devic
t->enabled, t->pending);
/* read current status of both alarms and the chip */
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->read_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, buf);
if (ret != 9) {
dev_err(dev, "%s error %d\n", "alarm write", ret);
@@ -391,7 +468,7 @@ static int ds1307_set_alarm(struct devic
}
buf[8] = status & ~(DS1337_BIT_A1I | DS1337_BIT_A2I);
- ret = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client,
+ ret = ds1307->write_block_data(client,
DS1339_REG_ALARM1_SECS, 9, buf);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "can't set alarm time\n");
@@ -479,7 +556,7 @@ ds1307_nvram_read(struct kobject *kobj,
if (unlikely(!count))
return count;
- result = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
+ result = ds1307->read_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
if (result < 0)
dev_err(&client->dev, "%s error %d\n", "nvram read", result);
return result;
@@ -490,9 +567,11 @@ ds1307_nvram_write(struct kobject *kobj,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
{
struct i2c_client *client;
+ struct ds1307 *ds1307;
int result;
client = kobj_to_i2c_client(kobj);
+ ds1307 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
if (unlikely(off >= NVRAM_SIZE))
return -EFBIG;
@@ -501,7 +580,7 @@ ds1307_nvram_write(struct kobject *kobj,
if (unlikely(!count))
return count;
- result = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
+ result = ds1307->write_block_data(client, 8 + off, count, buf);
if (result < 0) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "%s error %d\n", "nvram write", result);
return result;
@@ -536,9 +615,8 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
int want_irq = false;
unsigned char *buf;
- if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter,
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BYTE_DATA |
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK))
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA)
+ && !i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK))
return -EIO;
if (!(ds1307 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ds1307), GFP_KERNEL)))
@@ -548,6 +626,13 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
i2c_set_clientdata(client, ds1307);
ds1307->type = id->driver_data;
buf = ds1307->regs;
+ if (i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK)) {
+ ds1307->read_block_data = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data;
+ ds1307->write_block_data = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data;
+ } else {
+ ds1307->read_block_data = ds1307_read_block_data;
+ ds1307->write_block_data = ds1307_write_block_data;
+ }
switch (ds1307->type) {
case ds_1337:
@@ -558,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
want_irq = true;
}
/* get registers that the "rtc" read below won't read... */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client,
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client,
DS1337_REG_CONTROL, 2, buf);
if (tmp != 2) {
pr_debug("read error %d\n", tmp);
@@ -596,7 +681,7 @@ static int __devinit ds1307_probe(struct
read_rtc:
/* read RTC registers */
- tmp = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 8, buf);
+ tmp = ds1307->read_block_data(ds1307->client, 0, 8, buf);
if (tmp != 8) {
pr_debug("read error %d\n", tmp);
err = -EIO;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists