linux-kernel - Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] x86: i2c rtc instead of cmos rtc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:11:59 +0100
From:	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To:	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc:	eswierk@...stanetworks.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] x86: i2c rtc instead of cmos rtc

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:05:26 -0800
Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com> wrote:

> Would you prefer a single option to select the rtc (something like
> rtc.device={cmos|i2c,ds1339,1,0x68})? Or do you object to any option
> at all?

 I object to options of this kind. It took us a lot of efforts to move
 to the new i2c model and to the concept that devices have to be declared
 in the board support code. This kind of hack is in the opposite direction.

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/