linux-kernel - Re: x86: unify genapic code, unify subarchitectures, remove old subarchitecture code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:19:17 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86: unify genapic code, unify subarchitectures, remove old subarchitecture code

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:14:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar said:

> So two days ago it might have made some sense to rip out this code - now 
> there's no pressing need really. We can remove it in a few years once the 
> last beep has been received from those platforms. The numaq code is now 
> quite similar to an old driver in drivers/* - there's no real downside 
> from having it around.

Eventually, somebody will end up submitting a patch that adds the almost
inevitable 'depends on BROKEN' to the appropriate Kconfig...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped