lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:26:21 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>
Cc:	mikew@...gle.com, nauman@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][RESEND] Allow RT requests to pre-empt ongoing BE timeslice in CFQ.

On Wed, Jan 28 2009, Divyesh Shah wrote:

Strange, I was pretty sure this was added, but apparently not. Can you
resend a non-whitespace damaged version and I'll make sure to add it to
the mix.


> + Jens Axboe
> 
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds the ability to pre-empt an ongoing BE timeslice when a RT
> > request is waiting for the current timeslice to complete. This reduces the
> > wait time to disk for RT requests from an upper bound of 4 (current value
> > of cfq_quantum) to 1 disk request.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > Applied Jens' suggeested changes to avoid the rb lookup and use !cfq_class_rt()
> > and retested.
> >
> > Latency(secs) for the RT task when doing sequential reads from 10G file.
> >                       | only RT | RT + BE | RT + BE + this patch
> > small (512 byte) reads | 143     | 163     | 145
> > large (1Mb) reads      | 142     | 158     | 146
> >
> >  block/cfq-iosched.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > index e8525fa..5fec9e5 100644
> > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ struct cfq_data {
> >         */
> >        struct cfq_rb_root service_tree;
> >        unsigned int busy_queues;
> > +       /*
> > +        * Used to track any pending rt requests so we can pre-empt current
> > +        * non-RT cfqq in service when this value is non-zero.
> > +        */
> > +       unsigned int busy_rt_queues;
> >
> >        int rq_in_driver;
> >        int sync_flight;
> > @@ -562,6 +567,8 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
> >        BUG_ON(cfq_cfqq_on_rr(cfqq));
> >        cfq_mark_cfqq_on_rr(cfqq);
> >        cfqd->busy_queues++;
> > +       if (cfq_class_rt(cfqq))
> > +               cfqd->busy_rt_queues++;
> >
> >        cfq_resort_rr_list(cfqd, cfqq);
> >  }
> > @@ -581,6 +588,8 @@ static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
> >
> >        BUG_ON(!cfqd->busy_queues);
> >        cfqd->busy_queues--;
> > +       if (cfq_class_rt(cfqq))
> > +               cfqd->busy_rt_queues--;
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -1005,6 +1014,20 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_select_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
> >                goto expire;
> >
> >        /*
> > +        * If we have a RT cfqq waiting, then we pre-empt the current non-rt
> > +        * cfqq.
> > +        */
> > +       if (!cfq_class_rt(cfqq) && cfqd->busy_rt_queues) {
> > +               /*
> > +                * We simulate this as cfqq timed out so that it gets to bank
> > +                * the remaining of its time slice.
> > +                */
> > +               cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "preempt");
> > +               cfq_slice_expired(cfqd, 1);
> > +               goto new_queue;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       /*
> >         * The active queue has requests and isn't expired, allow it to
> >         * dispatch.
> >         */
> > @@ -1067,6 +1090,13 @@ __cfq_dispatch_requests(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
> >                if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list))
> >                        break;
> >
> > +               /*
> > +                * If there is a non-empty RT cfqq waiting for current
> > +                * cfqq's timeslice to complete, pre-empt this cfqq
> > +                */
> > +               if (!cfq_class_rt(cfqq) && cfqd->busy_rt_queues)
> > +                       break;
> > +
> >        } while (dispatched < max_dispatch);
> >
> >        /*
> > @@ -1801,6 +1831,12 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
> >        if (rq_is_meta(rq) && !cfqq->meta_pending)
> >                return 1;
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * Allow an RT request to pre-empt an ongoing non-RT cfqq timeslice.
> > +        */
> > +       if (cfq_class_rt(new_cfqq) && !cfq_class_rt(cfqq))
> > +               return 1;
> > +
> >        if (!cfqd->active_cic || !cfq_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq))
> >                return 0;
> >
> > @@ -1870,7 +1906,8 @@ cfq_rq_enqueued(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
> >                /*
> >                 * not the active queue - expire current slice if it is
> >                 * idle and has expired it's mean thinktime or this new queue
> > -                * has some old slice time left and is of higher priority
> > +                * has some old slice time left and is of higher priority or
> > +                * this new queue is RT and the current one is BE
> >                 */
> >                cfq_preempt_queue(cfqd, cfqq);
> >                cfq_mark_cfqq_must_dispatch(cfqq);
> >
> >

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ