linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH C 06/13] OMAP3 clock: DPLLs should enter bypass if new rate is sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:47:40 -0700 (MST)
From:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH C 06/13] OMAP3 clock: DPLLs should enter bypass if new
 rate is sys_ck

Hello Russell,

this E-mail responds to your comments on patches C 04 through C 08.  
My understanding is that you'd like me to:

1. Compress patches C 04 through C 09;

2. Modify omap3_noncore_dpll_enable() to move the "if (!ret)
   clk->rate = rate" outside and below the conditional;

3. Remove some of the blank lines before and after braces in C 06;

4. Modify the DPLL bypass clock handling to change the DPLL's clk->parent,
   rather than return the bypass clock rate.

The above all make sense to me, and #4, if it works in practice, should be 
a significant improvement over the existing code.

If this is what you're looking for, I'll send a compressed, modified 
patch.  Would you like it to be based on the codebase post C 03, or 
against another commit?

regards,

- Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/