linux-kernel - Re: Fat64 / exFat fs and Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:45:46 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	A B <spinflipper4@...oo.co.uk>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fat64 / exFat fs and Linux

OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes:

> A B <spinflipper4@...oo.co.uk> writes:
>
>>> Ok, I've put the patchset to,
>>> 
>>>     http://userweb.kernel.org/~hirofumi/exfat/exfat.tar.gz
>>> 
>>> exfat/series is patch order to apply, and exfat/patches/* is patches.
>>> 
>>> It would be temporary place, well, anyway, this is my lastest version.
>>> 
>>
>> Thanks for the code, I patched it into 2.6.28.2 and tried it on a 128MB USB
>> volume filled with many files. The driver correctly read 73% of the files.
>> Impressive. Looking at the others, they seemed to have what I would call
>> 'alignment problems'.
>>
>> md5sum: WARNING: 1008 of 3842 computed checksums did NOT match

I've updated the tarballs to fix the bug he found. If someone tried old
tarballs, please download new tarballs and try.

     http://userweb.kernel.org/~hirofumi/exfat/exfat.tar.gz

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/