linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] simple_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:32:34 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, hpa@...or.com, hch@....de,
	serue@...ibm.com, "David C. Hansen" <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
	Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sukadev@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] simple_set_mnt() should return void

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30:01PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> 
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:11:13 -0800
> Subject: [RFC][PATCH] simple_set_mnt() should return void
> 
> simple_set_mnt() is defined to return int but always returns 0.
> Callers assume simple_set_mnt() never fails and don't properly
> cleanup if it were to _ever_ fail. For instance, get_sb_single()
> and get_sb_nodev() should:
> 
>         up_write(sb->s_unmount);
>         deactivate_super(sb);
> 
> if simple_set_mnt() fails.
> 
> Since simple_set_mnt() never fails, would be cleaner if it did
> not return anything.

Makes sense to me.  Feel free to resend once you did an allmodconfig
or similar build.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/