linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Unroll essentials of do_remount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:34:40 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, hpa@...or.com,
	serue@...ibm.com, "David C. Hansen" <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
	Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sukadev@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Unroll essentials of do_remount_sb() into devpts

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:45:47PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> +	fsi = DEVPTS_SB(s);
> +	opts = &fsi->mount_opts;
> +	parse_mount_options(data, PARSE_REMOUNT, opts);

You could probably get rid of at least the fsi variable without making the
code less readable.  Independent of these cosmetic bits the patch looks
good to me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/