[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:45:25 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] create workqueue threads only when needed
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:01:56 +0100
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:37:41 +1100
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >> That's were thread pools kick in ... tried using Dave Howells slow
> >> work ?
> >
> > async function calls are pretty much the same and actually in
> > mainlinme. Dave Howells stuff in addition plays some extremely
> > weird refcounting games that I cannot imagine anyone but him
> > needing...
>
> I haven't looked at this particular slow-work implementation. Do you
> refer to some internal refcounting or to some refcounting as a service
> for the API user?
the later. which I find a bit weird ;)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists