[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:39:30 -0800
From: Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@...il.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: main thread pthread_exit/sys_exit bug!
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com> wrote:
> The userlevel context of the
> thread is not usable anymore. It will have run all kinds of
> destructors. The current behavior is AFAIK that the main thread won't
> react to any signal anymore. That is absolutely required.
Hey Ulrich,
Thanks for articulating that requirement. I think it can be met by
extending the patch a little bit. We can keep the main thread parked
inside sys_exit /and/ get it not to react to signals internally, yet
have the external behavior that the process reacts in the normal
way to certain signals like SIGTSTP, SIGCONT, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists