linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] TPM: refactoring and integrity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:47:38 +1100 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, matthltc@...ibm.com,
	zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] TPM: refactoring and integrity

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Rajiv Andrade wrote:

> This patchset contains a refactoring patch and integrity one. The first addresses Matt Helsley and Dave Hansen's comments on replacing the data[] vectors by packed structures making the code easier to read and debug and also consolidates most of the tpm_show_* functions. The second one provides an interface to read and extend PCR values, which is widely used by IMA.
> 
> This version also addresses Matt Helsley's last observation on the timeout_t structure usage to access TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION capability, now a new structure is being used, duration_t, whose fields now match exactly as defined in the TPM specification.
> 
> Rajiv Andrade (2):
>   TPM: sysfs functions consolidation
>   TPM: integrity interface

Which kernel are these patches against?  They don't apply to either 
security-testing or linus.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/