[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:55:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Thomas Pilarski <thomas.pi@...or.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12562] New: High overhead while switching or
synchronizing threads on different cores
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 09:52 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 09:33 +0100, Thomas Pilarski wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 09:19 +0100 schrieb Peter Zijlstra:
> > > I suppose you'll have to go bug the glibc people about their random()
> > > implementation.
> >
> > Yes, I will.
>
> Finding the below was easy enough...
Ah, that was a good clue, apparently all you need to so it use
random_r() and provide your own state and all should be well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists