linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] softlockup: check all tasks in hung

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:34:53 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>
Cc:	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
	mbligh@...gle.com, thockin@...gle.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] softlockup: check all tasks in hung_task


* Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com> wrote:

> The batch_count controls the preemptibility of hung_task. While it might 
> not make sense to expose the value to user-space, we may want to use a 
> different value for the PREEMPT config (not sure what the specific values 
> should be):
> 
> #if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)
> static const int check_count_batching = 256;
> #else
> static const int check_count_batching = 2048;
> #endif

That really is not worth it - and such #ifdefs always look ugly and split 
testing as well.

I've applied your patch to tip:core/softlockup, thanks Mandeep!

	Ingo

------------->
>From 9952001914a7230ab88212a1e2d0e80208bdb907 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:35:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] softlockup: check all tasks in hung_task
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Impact: extend the scope of hung-task checks

Changed the default value of hung_task_check_count to PID_MAX_LIMIT.
hung_task_batch_count added to put an upper bound on the critical
section. Every hung_task_batch_count checks, the rcu lock is never
held for a too long time.

Keeping the critical section small minimizes time preemption is disabled
and keeps rcu grace periods small.

To prevent following a stale pointer, get_task_struct is called on g and t.
To verify that g and t have not been unhashed while outside the critical
section, the task states are checked.

The design was proposed by Frédéric Weisbecker.

Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>
Suggested-by: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 kernel/hung_task.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
index ba8ccd4..d32d293 100644
--- a/kernel/hung_task.c
+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
@@ -17,9 +17,18 @@
 #include <linux/sysctl.h>
 
 /*
- * Have a reasonable limit on the number of tasks checked:
+ * The number of tasks checked:
  */
-unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_check_count = 1024;
+unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_check_count = PID_MAX_LIMIT;
+
+/*
+ * Limit number of tasks checked in a batch.
+ *
+ * This value controls the preemptibility of khungtaskd since preemption
+ * is disabled during the critical section. It also controls the size of
+ * the RCU grace period. So it needs to be upper-bound.
+ */
+static const int hung_task_batching = 1024;
 
 /*
  * Zero means infinite timeout - no checking done:
@@ -109,6 +118,24 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now,
 		panic("hung_task: blocked tasks");
 }
 
+ /*
+  * To avoid extending the RCU grace period for an unbounded amount of time,
+  * periodically exit the critical section and enter a new one.
+  *
+  * For preemptible RCU it is sufficient to call rcu_read_unlock in order
+  * exit the grace period. For classic RCU, a reschedule is required.
+  */
+static void rcu_lock_break(struct task_struct *g, struct task_struct *t)
+{
+	get_task_struct(g);
+	get_task_struct(t);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	cond_resched();
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	put_task_struct(t);
+	put_task_struct(g);
+}
+
 /*
  * Check whether a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE does not get woken up for
  * a really long time (120 seconds). If that happens, print out
@@ -116,6 +143,7 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now,
  */
 static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
 {
+	int batch_count = hung_task_batching;
 	int max_count = sysctl_hung_task_check_count;
 	unsigned long now = get_timestamp();
 	struct task_struct *g, *t;
@@ -131,6 +159,13 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
 	do_each_thread(g, t) {
 		if (!--max_count)
 			goto unlock;
+		if (!--batch_count) {
+			batch_count = hung_task_batching;
+			rcu_lock_break(g, t);
+			/* Exit if t or g was unhashed during refresh. */
+			if (t->state == TASK_DEAD || g->state == TASK_DEAD)
+				goto unlock;
+		}
 		/* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks waiting on NFS */
 		if (t->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
 			check_hung_task(t, now, timeout);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/