linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:20:22 -0800
From:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	oleg@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, roland@...hat.com,
	bastian@...di.eu.org
Cc:	daniel@...ac.com, xemul@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics

Sukadev Bhattiprolu [sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
| Patches in this set:
| 
| 	[PATCH 1/7] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions
| 	[PATCH 2/7] Protect init from unwanted signals more
| 	[PATCH 3/7] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal()
| 	[PATCH 4/7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
| 	[PATCH 5/7] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals
| 	[PATCH 6/7] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary
| 	[PATCH 7/7] proc: Show SIG_DFL signals to init as "ignored" signals

Roland, Eric, Daniel, Pavel

Any comments on this patchset ? We are not sure about patch 7, but should
I send the rest to Andrew ?

Sukadev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/