linux-kernel - Re: cgroup, RT reservation per core(s)?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:42:14 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Rolando Martins <rolando.martins@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: cgroup, RT reservation per core(s)?

On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 11:33 +0000, Rolando Martins wrote:

> Hi again,
> 
> is there any way to have multiple "distinct" sched domains, i.e.:
> mount -t cgroup -o cpu none /dev/sched_domain_0
> .... setup sched_domain_0 (ex:  90% RT, 10% Others)
> mount -t cgroup -o cpu none /dev/sched_domain_1
> .... setup sched_domain_1 (ex:  20% RT, 80% Others)
> Then give sched_domain_0 to cpuset A and sched_domain_1 to B?

Nope.

We currently only support a single instance of a cgroup controller.

I see the use for what you propose, however implementing that will be
'interesting'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/