linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Use pt_regs pointer in do_device_not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:46:46 -0500
From:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Use pt_regs pointer in do_device_not_available()

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Brian Gerst wrote:
>> I don't quite follow what you are trying to say here.  Are you saying
>> use the same calling convention for the exception handlers (anything
>> called from error_code) and system calls?
>
> Yeap.

Doesn't make sense to me, two very fundamentally different things.  I
supposed you could eliminate the error_code parameter, but that's alot
of work to remove just one instruction.

--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/