lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:12:16 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] forget_original_parent: split out the un-ptrace part

By discussion with Roland.

- Rename ptrace_exit() to exit_ptrace(), and change it to do all the
  necessary work with ->ptraced list by its own.

- Move this code from exit.c to ptrace.c

- Update the comment in ptrace_detach() to explain the rechecking of
  the child->ptrace.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

 include/linux/ptrace.h |    2 -
 include/linux/sched.h  |    5 ++
 kernel/exit.c          |   95 +++----------------------------------------------
 kernel/ptrace.c        |   78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

--- 6.29-rc3/include/linux/ptrace.h~1_UNTRACE	2009-01-29 17:11:30.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/include/linux/ptrace.h	2009-02-11 02:41:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ extern void ptrace_notify(int exit_code)
 extern void __ptrace_link(struct task_struct *child,
 			  struct task_struct *new_parent);
 extern void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child);
-extern int __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p);
+extern void exit_ptrace(struct task_struct *tracer);
 extern void ptrace_fork(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long clone_flags);
 #define PTRACE_MODE_READ   1
 #define PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH 2
--- 6.29-rc3/include/linux/sched.h~1_UNTRACE	2009-01-29 01:13:55.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/include/linux/sched.h	2009-02-11 03:05:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -2014,6 +2014,11 @@ static inline int thread_group_empty(str
 #define delay_group_leader(p) \
 		(thread_group_leader(p) && !thread_group_empty(p))
 
+static inline int task_detached(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return p->exit_signal == -1;
+}
+
 /*
  * Protects ->fs, ->files, ->mm, ->group_info, ->comm, keyring
  * subscriptions and synchronises with wait4().  Also used in procfs.  Also
--- 6.29-rc3/kernel/exit.c~1_UNTRACE	2009-02-11 01:48:57.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/kernel/exit.c	2009-02-11 03:01:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ DEFINE_TRACE(sched_process_wait);
 
 static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk);
 
-static inline int task_detached(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	return p->exit_signal == -1;
-}
-
 static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	nr_threads--;
@@ -728,85 +723,6 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct *
 	mmput(mm);
 }
 
-/*
- * Called with irqs disabled, returns true if childs should reap themselves.
- */
-static int ignoring_children(struct sighand_struct *sigh)
-{
-	int ret;
-	spin_lock(&sigh->siglock);
-	ret = (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) ||
-	      (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDWAIT);
-	spin_unlock(&sigh->siglock);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/* Returns nonzero if the tracee should be released. */
-int __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	__ptrace_unlink(p);
-
-	if (p->exit_state != EXIT_ZOMBIE)
-		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * If it's a zombie, our attachedness prevented normal
-	 * parent notification or self-reaping.  Do notification
-	 * now if it would have happened earlier.  If it should
-	 * reap itself we return true.
-	 *
-	 * If it's our own child, there is no notification to do.
-	 * But if our normal children self-reap, then this child
-	 * was prevented by ptrace and we must reap it now.
-	 */
-	if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) {
-		if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, tracer))
-			do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal);
-		else if (ignoring_children(tracer->sighand))
-			p->exit_signal = -1;
-	}
-
-	if (!task_detached(p))
-		return 0;
-
-	/* Mark it as in the process of being reaped. */
-	p->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD;
-	return 1;
-}
-
-/*
- * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on.
- * Any that need to be release_task'd are put on the @dead list.
- *
- * Called with write_lock(&tasklist_lock) held.
- */
-static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead)
-{
-	struct task_struct *p, *n;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &parent->ptraced, ptrace_entry) {
-		if (__ptrace_detach(parent, p))
-			list_add(&p->ptrace_entry, dead);
-	}
-}
-
-/*
- * Finish up exit-time ptrace cleanup.
- *
- * Called without locks.
- */
-static void ptrace_exit_finish(struct task_struct *parent,
-			       struct list_head *dead)
-{
-	struct task_struct *p, *n;
-
-	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&parent->ptraced));
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, dead, ptrace_entry) {
-		list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
-		release_task(p);
-	}
-}
-
 /* Returns nonzero if the child should be released. */
 static int reparent_thread(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *father)
 {
@@ -891,12 +807,10 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struc
 	struct task_struct *p, *n, *reaper;
 	LIST_HEAD(ptrace_dead);
 
+	exit_ptrace(father);
+
 	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	reaper = find_new_reaper(father);
-	/*
-	 * First clean up ptrace if we were using it.
-	 */
-	ptrace_exit(father, &ptrace_dead);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &father->children, sibling) {
 		p->real_parent = reaper;
@@ -911,7 +825,10 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struc
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&father->children));
 
-	ptrace_exit_finish(father, &ptrace_dead);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &ptrace_dead, ptrace_entry) {
+		list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
+		release_task(p);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
--- 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c~1_UNTRACE	2009-02-11 01:44:52.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c	2009-02-11 04:04:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -235,9 +235,57 @@ out:
 	return retval;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Called with irqs disabled, returns true if childs should reap themselves.
+ */
+static int ignoring_children(struct sighand_struct *sigh)
+{
+	int ret;
+	spin_lock(&sigh->siglock);
+	ret = (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) ||
+	      (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDWAIT);
+	spin_unlock(&sigh->siglock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Called with tasklist_lock held for writing.
+ * Unlink a traced task, and clean it up if it was a traced zombie.
+ * Return true if it needs to be reaped with release_task().
+ * (We can't call release_task() here because we already hold tasklist_lock.)
+ *
+ * If it's a zombie, our attachedness prevented normal parent notification
+ * or self-reaping.  Do notification now if it would have happened earlier.
+ * If it should reap itself, return true.
+ *
+ * If it's our own child, there is no notification to do.
+ * But if our normal children self-reap, then this child
+ * was prevented by ptrace and we must reap it now.
+ */
+static bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	__ptrace_unlink(p);
+
+	if (p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) {
+		if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) {
+			if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, tracer))
+				do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal);
+			else if (ignoring_children(tracer->sighand))
+				p->exit_signal = -1;
+		}
+		if (task_detached(p)) {
+			/* Mark it as in the process of being reaped. */
+			p->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD;
+			return true;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int data)
 {
-	int dead = 0;
+	bool dead = false;
 
 	if (!valid_signal(data))
 		return -EIO;
@@ -247,7 +295,10 @@ int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *ch
 	clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
 
 	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
-	/* protect against de_thread()->release_task() */
+	/*
+	 * This child can be already killed. Make sure de_thread() or
+	 * our sub-thread doing do_wait() didn't do release_task() yet.
+	 */
 	if (child->ptrace) {
 		child->exit_code = data;
 
@@ -264,6 +315,29 @@ int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *ch
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on.
+ */
+void exit_ptrace(struct task_struct *tracer)
+{
+	struct task_struct *p, *n;
+	LIST_HEAD(ptrace_dead);
+
+	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &tracer->ptraced, ptrace_entry) {
+		if (__ptrace_detach(tracer, p))
+			list_add(&p->ptrace_entry, &ptrace_dead);
+	}
+	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&tracer->ptraced));
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &ptrace_dead, ptrace_entry) {
+		list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
+		release_task(p);
+	}
+}
+
 int ptrace_readdata(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long src, char __user *dst, int len)
 {
 	int copied = 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ