| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:09:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...x.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Carsten Emde <ce@...g.ch>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
rusty <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch] generic-ipi: remove kmalloc, cleanup
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:16 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:19 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > hm, that's a complex one - we do kfree() from IPI context, [...]
> > > >
> > > > The patch below might do the trick - it offloads this to a softirq.
> > > > Not tested yet.
> > >
> > > The simple fix is something like:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > kernel/smp.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > ok, i made it unconditional (not just a PREEMPT_RT hac) and did the
> > cleanup below on top of it.
> >
> > I dont think repeat, queued IPIs are all that interesting from a
> > performance point of view. If they are, it will all be clearly
> > bisectable.
>
> Right, except I really don't like the smp_call_function_many() slow path
> that's now the only path.
>
> Rusty did that I think, but he also had some idea on how to fix it, I
> think it boiled down to sticking a count in the call data instead of the
> full cpumask.
>
> So I'd rather we first fix that code, and then remove the kmalloc
> all-together like you propose here.
Right, I can't see a way around carrying that cpumask, there's just too
much that can go wrong without it.
So it put in unconditionally, how about this?
--
Subject: generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many()
In preparation of removing the kmalloc() calls from the generic-ipi code
get rid of the single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many().
Because we cannot get around carrying the cpumask in the data -- imagine
2 such calls with different but overlapping masks -- put in a full mask.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/smp.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index bbedbb7..e6658e5 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct call_function_data {
spinlock_t lock;
unsigned int refs;
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
- unsigned long cpumask_bits[];
+ struct cpumask cpumask;
};
struct call_single_queue {
@@ -111,13 +111,13 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void)
list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &call_function_queue, csd.list) {
int refs;
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits)))
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &data->cpumask))
continue;
data->csd.func(data->csd.info);
spin_lock(&data->lock);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &data->cpumask);
WARN_ON(data->refs == 0);
data->refs--;
refs = data->refs;
@@ -137,8 +137,10 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void)
*/
smp_wmb();
data->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
- }
- if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC)
+ } else if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK) {
+ smp_wmb();
+ data->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
+ } else if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC)
call_rcu(&data->rcu_head, rcu_free_call_data);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -302,6 +304,8 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
arch_send_call_function_ipi(*(maskp))
#endif
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
+
/**
* smp_call_function_many(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs.
* @mask: The set of cpus to run on (only runs on online subset).
@@ -323,14 +327,14 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
{
struct call_function_data *data;
unsigned long flags;
- int cpu, next_cpu;
+ int cpu, next_cpu, me = smp_processor_id();
/* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
/* So, what's a CPU they want? Ignoring this one. */
cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
+ if (cpu == me)
cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
/* No online cpus? We're done. */
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
@@ -338,7 +342,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
/* Do we have another CPU which isn't us? */
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (next_cpu == smp_processor_id())
+ if (next_cpu == me)
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
/* Fastpath: do that cpu by itself. */
@@ -347,27 +351,24 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
return;
}
- data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data) + cpumask_size(), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (unlikely(!data)) {
- /* Slow path. */
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
- continue;
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
- smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
- }
- return;
+ data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (data)
+ data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
+ else {
+ data = &per_cpu(cfd_data, me);
+ while (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
+ cpu_relax();
+ data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
}
spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
- data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
if (wait)
data->csd.flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
data->csd.func = func;
data->csd.info = info;
- cpumask_and(to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits), mask, cpu_online_mask);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
- data->refs = cpumask_weight(to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
+ cpumask_and(&data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &data->cpumask);
+ data->refs = cpumask_weight(&data->cpumask);
spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function_lock, flags);
list_add_tail_rcu(&data->csd.list, &call_function_queue);
@@ -379,7 +380,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
smp_mb();
/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
- arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
+ arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(&data->cpumask);
/* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
if (wait)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists