linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clockevents: avoid unnecessary reprograming of event timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:39:24 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>, mbligh@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents: avoid unnecessary reprograming of event
 timer

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > +	if (ktime_equal(dev->next_event, expires))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> 
> Hm, given that a good high-res source has nanoseconds resolution,
> what's the chance of this optimization triggering in practice?
> Near zero i think - unless we trigger useless reprogramming without
> having added or removed any new timers - but then we should
> concentrate on analyzing the reason for that redundant reprogramming.
> 
> Does it trigger often for you?

The only point where this should trigger is when we come out of C2/C3
and switch the local APIC timer back on. There we reload the
next_event which was discarded in the hardware before we entered C2/C3
and switched to the broadcast timer. So this change would prevent the
rearming of the local APIC after coming out of C2/C3 and probably give
us some new C-State related headaches.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/