linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 10/10] Sample HW breakpoint over kernel data address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:57:08 +0530
From:	"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...izon.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, richardj_moore@...ibm.com,
	jason.wessel@...driver.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 10/10] Sample HW breakpoint over kernel data address

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:43:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * K.Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:38:41AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Friday 13 February 2009, K.Prasad wrote:
> > > 
> > > A whole patch series sent as private email, but which should have been 
> > > submitted to lkml?  Please configure your email agent correctly.
> > 
> > I realised that a little late and hence bounced the mails to LKML. It
> > was an oversight on my part, will be more careful henceforth.
> 
> Hm, bouncing is not necessarily a good idea, as followups will not have
> lkml Cc:-ed. I'd suggest a repost, with lkml added.
> 
> 	Ingo

Sure. I'm re-posting the patches with LKML included in the recipient.

Thanks,
K.Prasad

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/