linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #12650] Strange load average and ksoftirqd behavior with 2.6.29-rc2-git1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:25:03 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12650] Strange load average and ksoftirqd behavior with
	2.6.29-rc2-git1


* Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr> wrote:

> > Also, could you send the output of:
> 
> >   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
> 
> > Run it while you can see the ksoftirqd anomaly.
> 
> In fact I see it all the time when the machine is idle. When something 
> runs (spamd for example), the running time of ksoftirqd stops 
> increasing, and it goes back to increasing like crazy when idle state 
> comes back.

here's the ksoftirqd stats from your data:

top - 08:09:20 up 2 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.95, 0.35, 0.13
Tasks: 100 total,   1 running,  99 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  0.4%us,  1.3%sy,  0.0%ni, 89.2%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  9.0%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   2074980k total,   236544k used,  1838436k free,     5032k buffers
Swap:  1212896k total,        0k used,  1212896k free,    66016k cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND            
 2280 root      15  -5     0    0    0 S   22  0.0   0:06.39 [ksoftirqd/1]      
 2452 root      20   0  2400 1132  888 R    1  0.1   0:00.02 top -H -c -b -d 1 -
    1 root      20   0  2100  688  588 S    0  0.0   0:00.48 init [2]           
    2 root      15  -5     0    0    0 S    0  0.0   0:00.00 [kthreadd]         

ksoftirqd really seems to be active (according to scheduler stats), and 
has gathered more than 6 seconds of runtime after 2 minutes of uptime - 
that is clearly anomalous.

The main method how softirqs get generated are hardirqs, but the hardirq 
is low on your box (as expected):

-- interrupts: --
           CPU0       CPU1       
  0:        155          0   IO-APIC-edge      timer
  1:          2          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
  7:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      parport0
  8:          2          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc
  9:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
 12:          4          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
 14:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
 15:        132          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
 16:        213          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5
 18:       6908          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ata_piix, uhci_hcd:usb4
 19:        221          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb3
 20:       1072          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   eth0
 21:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   EMU10K1
 23:          4          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ehci_hcd:usb1
NMI:          0          0   Non-maskable interrupts
LOC:      79306      74184   Local timer interrupts
CNT:          0          0   Performance counter interrupts
RES:      32672      13541   Rescheduling interrupts
CAL:          8         40   Function call interrupts
TLB:        235        591   TLB shootdowns
TRM:          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
SPU:          0          0   Spurious interrupts
ERR:          0
MIS:          0

about 200K irqs - most of which are lapic timer irqs. Thus 6 seconds of 
ksoftirqd runtime is way too much.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/