linux-kernel - Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:18:50 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
	Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
	Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

On Tue 2009-02-17 00:00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > > Userland should never ever control the state of a device like this
> > > > directly. It should do so by a) closing the device and b) setting
> > > > latency / functional requirements.
> > > 
> > > The user, however, may want to forcibly put a device into a low power state
> > > without stopping all of the applications that depend on it (eg. have it open).
> > > Do you think that we shouldn't allow users to do such things?
> > 
> > I don't think we should do this... of you want device to be powered
> > down, just don't keep it open. revoke should be enough :-).
> > 
> > ...one execption here is the disk driver; unmounting filesystems to
> > let the disk spin down is probably too heavy.
> 
> Well, I don't think it's viable to make any exceptions here.  Either we do it
> or we don't.  And the agreement appears to be that we don't.

We already have interface to force disk down (for disk protectioon
stuff), so this is already done for other reasons.

But in general, close(joystick) is nicer interface then 'echo
turn-off-joystick-even-when-open > /sys/somewhere'.
					

								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/