lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:15:08 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>,
	Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] libata: Don't trust current capacity values in identify
 words 57-58

Hanno Böck reported a problem where an old Conner CP30254 240MB hard drive
was reported as 1.1TB in capacity by libata:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/13/134

This was caused by libata trusting the drive's reported current capacity in 
sectors in identify words 57 and 58 if the drive does not support LBA and the
current CHS translation values appear valid. Unfortunately it seems older
ATA specs were vague about what this field should contain and a number of drives
used values with wrong byte order or that were totally bogus. There's no
unique information that it conveys and so we can just calculate the number
of sectors from the reported current CHS values.

While we're at it, clean up this function to use named constants for the
identify word values.

Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 9fbf059..33b5549 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -1322,14 +1322,16 @@ static u64 ata_id_n_sectors(const u16 *id)
 {
 	if (ata_id_has_lba(id)) {
 		if (ata_id_has_lba48(id))
-			return ata_id_u64(id, 100);
+			return ata_id_u64(id, ATA_ID_LBA_CAPACITY_2);
 		else
-			return ata_id_u32(id, 60);
+			return ata_id_u32(id, ATA_ID_LBA_CAPACITY);
 	} else {
 		if (ata_id_current_chs_valid(id))
-			return ata_id_u32(id, 57);
+			return id[ATA_ID_CUR_CYLS] * id[ATA_ID_CUR_HEADS] *
+			       id[ATA_ID_CUR_SECTORS];
 		else
-			return id[1] * id[3] * id[6];
+			return id[ATA_ID_CYLS] * id[ATA_ID_HEADS] *
+			       id[ATA_ID_SECTORS];
 	}
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ