linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] vm_unmap_aliases: allow callers to inhibit TLB flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:57:56 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] vm_unmap_aliases: allow callers to inhibit TLB flush

Nick Piggin wrote:
> I have patches to move the tlb flushing to an asynchronous process context...
> but all tweaks to that (including flushing at vmap) are just variations on the
> existing flushing scheme and don't solve your problem, so I don't think we
> really need to change that for the moment (my patches are mainly for latency
> improvement and to allow vunmap to be usable from interrupt context).
>   

Hi Nick,

I'm very interested in being able to call vm_unmap_aliases() from 
interrupt context.  Does the work you mention here encompass that?

For Xen dom0, when someone does something like dma_alloc_coherent, we 
allocate the memory as normal, and then swizzle the underlying physical 
pages to be machine physically contiguous (vs contiguous pseudo-physical 
guest memory), and within the addressable range for the device.  In 
order to do that, we need to make sure the pages are only mapped by the 
linear mapping, and there are no other aliases.

And since drivers are free to allocate dma memory at interrupt time, 
this needs to happen at interrupt time too.

(The tlb flush issue that started this read should be a non-issue for 
Xen, at least, because all cross-cpu tlb flushes should happen via  a 
hypercall rather than kernel-initiated IPIs, so there's no possibility 
of deadlock.  Though I'll happily admit that taking advantage of the 
implementation properties of a particular implementation is not very 
pretty...)

Thanks,
    J

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/