linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/4] vfs: add set_page_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:35:06 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, edward.shishkin@...il.com, npiggin@...e.de,
	rmh3093@...il.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] vfs: add set_page_dirty_notag

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:43:28 +0300
Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com> wrote:

> + */
> +int set_page_dirty_notag(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> +
> +	if (!TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));
> +		if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
> +		        /*
> +			 * The accounting functions rely on
> +			 * being atomic wrt interrupts.
> +			 */
> +		        unsigned long flags;
> +			local_irq_save(flags);
> +			__inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
> +			__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info,
> +				       BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
> +			task_dirty_inc(current);
> +			task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> +			local_irq_restore(flags);
> +		}
> +		__mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}

I'll maintain this in -mm, alongside the resier4 patches which need it.

Of course, this rather obviates the purpose - if someone changes, say,
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers() then they won't similarly update
set_page_dirty_notag().  Oh well.

This problem would fix itself if those two functions were to
substantially share code.  And I think we can do that - something like

static void
update_page_accounting(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping)
{
	__inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
	__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
	task_dirty_inc(current);
	task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
}

maybe?

We could do that as a separate patch and merge it into mainline - it
should have zero impact on code generation if gcc does the right thing
(please check this).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/