| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:38:24 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: jeremy@...p.org Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org, gitster@...ox.com, mingo@...e.hu, caglar@...dus.org.tr Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add *.rej to .gitignore From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:59:37 -0800 > *.rej files really are unwanted. If there are any .rej files, they can be found by > some other means (perhaps git itself could warn when committing with *.rej files present, > or add some distinct notion of "ignored files" vs "never commit" files). > > (This effectively reverts 1f5d3a6b6532e25a5cdf1f311956b2b03d343a48) > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com> I don't know about this. I really want to know if there are reject files there if I am checking to see if my tree is clean. This has caught many patch application errors for myself personally in the past, so I really don't want git to start silently ignoring those things. People should delete reject file explicitly, as they are evidence of a patch that would not apply cleanly. If you abort trying to add the patch, fine, but cleaning up the reject files is part of that operation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists