linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:35:20 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n

> Is destroy_params() dependent on SYSFS? If yes then it would be 

Yes.

> far cleaner if there was a NOP destroy_params() inline for the 
> !SYSFS case.




From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>

Fix this build error when CONFIG_SYSFS=n:

kernel/built-in.o: In function `free_module':
module.c:(.text+0x4f8a2): undefined reference to `destroy_params'

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
---
 kernel/params.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

--- linux-next-20090218.orig/kernel/params.c
+++ linux-next-20090218/kernel/params.c
@@ -761,6 +761,12 @@ static int __init param_sysfs_init(void)
 }
 subsys_initcall(param_sysfs_init);
 
+#else	/* !CONFIG_SYSFS */
+
+inline void destroy_params(const struct kernel_param *params, unsigned num)
+{
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(param_set_byte);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/