| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:31:54 +0000 From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, bernds_cb1@...nline.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote: > > My x86_64 usualconfig just exploded with > > > > fs/romfs/storage.c:18:2: error: #error no ROMFS backing store interface configured > > To be able to use romfs you have to set one or both of the two backing store > options with this patch. Commenting out the #error isn't good enough. This > needs some Kconfig magic, but I'm not sure what. Perhaps a choice item? The attached patch seems to work quite nicely. I wouldn't really want to do this if there were more than two options. If you like it, I can fold it into the main patch. David --- From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Subject: [PATCH] NOMMU: Fix the RomFS Kconfig to ensure at least one backing store is selected Fix the configuration of the RomFS to make sure that at least one backing store method is always selected. This is done by rendering it down to a choice item that selects between Block, MTD and both. This also works correctly in the case that CONFIG_MTD=m: MTD cannot be selected as a backing store unless CONFIG_ROMFS_FS is also 'm'. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> --- fs/romfs/Kconfig | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/romfs/Kconfig b/fs/romfs/Kconfig index 802c742..ce2d6bc 100644 --- a/fs/romfs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/romfs/Kconfig @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ config ROMFS_FS tristate "ROM file system support" - depends on BLOCK + depends on BLOCK || MTD ---help--- This is a very small read-only file system mainly intended for initial ram disks of installation disks, but it could be used for @@ -15,9 +15,19 @@ config ROMFS_FS If you don't know whether you need it, then you don't need it: answer N. -config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK - bool "Block device-backed ROM file system support" if (ROMFS_ON_MTD && EMBEDDED) - depends on ROMFS_FS && BLOCK +# +# Select the backing stores to be supported +# +choice + prompt "RomFS backing stores" + depends on ROMFS_FS + default ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK + help + Select the backing stores to be supported. + +config ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK + bool "Block device-backed ROM file system support" + depends on BLOCK help This permits ROMFS to use block devices buffered through the page cache as the medium from which to retrieve data. It does not allow @@ -25,9 +35,8 @@ config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK If unsure, answer Y. -config ROMFS_ON_MTD +config ROMFS_BACKED_BY_MTD bool "MTD-backed ROM file system support" - depends on ROMFS_FS depends on MTD=y || (ROMFS_FS=m && MTD) help This permits ROMFS to use MTD based devices directly, without the @@ -38,3 +47,16 @@ config ROMFS_ON_MTD If unsure, answer Y. +config ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH + bool "Both the above" + depends on BLOCK && (MTD=y || (ROMFS_FS=m && MTD)) +endchoice + + +config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK + bool + default y if ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK || ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH + +config ROMFS_ON_MTD + bool + default y if ROMFS_BACKED_BY_MTD || ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists