linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: break out modify loop immediately on detection of error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:33:34 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: break out modify loop immediately on
	detection of error


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -561,11 +561,15 @@ static void ftrace_replace_code(int enable)
>  				if ((system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) ||
>  				    !core_kernel_text(rec->ip)) {
>  					ftrace_free_rec(rec);
> -				} else
> +				} else {
>  					ftrace_bug(failed, rec->ip);
> +					goto out;
> +				}
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> + out:
> +	return;

wouldnt a simple 'break' suffice? Hm, nope, 
do_for_each_ftrace_rec() is a double loop.

Then perhaps a 'return' would perhaps be cleaner in this case. 
(even though it does make the flow a bit assymetric - the out 
label and the empty return looks a bit ugly.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/