lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:15:50 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel building procedure changed?

On 23.2.2009 00:00, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:27:51PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 22.2.2009 23:16, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:07:48AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I found a bit strange thing happens now --
>>>> plain
>>>>
>>>> 	make arch/x86/kernel/head64.o
>>>>
>>>> doesn't work anymore. Instead of compiling
>>>> _just_ this file I've got the following:
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> cyrill@...ovo linux-2.6.git $ make arch/x86/kernel/head64.o
>>>>    CHK     include/linux/version.h
>>>>    CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
>>>>    SYMLINK include/asm ->   include/asm-x86
>>>>    CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>>>>    CHK     include/linux/compile.h
>>>>    AS      arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
>>>>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso-syms.lds
>>>>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
>>>>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syscall-syms.lds
>>>>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
>>>>    VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
>>>>    LD      arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
>>>>    CC      fs/hpfs/dnode.o
>>>> make[2]: *** [fs/hpfs/dnode.o] Interrupt
>>>> make[1]: *** [fs/hpfs] Interrupt
>>>> make: *** [fs] Interrupt
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> I've done make allyesconfig previously.
>>>> I don't understand what I'm doing wrong... :(
>>> I should work...
>> It is matter of days, new mmotm doesn't work either, older did.
>
> Does it happen with -next?

yes, aa0f1f110f4cbbbb83fbac36f71651b232cd8b32

> Does it happen with mainline?

yes, 683fdc5fe5fec5c4f27eb58a8781f212f50c8e01

> I need to know what tree to look at - and I do not have mmotm handy.

some of -tip too, 8075257261ba779bfc81bec4b633a3984617cdd5 -- this sha 
posted me Cyrill before he left.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ