| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:17:13 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: gfp_to_alloc_flags()
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:55:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I've always found the below a clean-up, respun it on top of your changes.
> Test box still boots ;-)
>
> ---
> Subject: mm: gfp_to_alloc_flags()
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Mon Feb 23 12:46:36 CET 2009
>
> Clean up the code by factoring out the gfp to alloc_flags mapping.
>
> [neilb@...e.de says]
> As the test:
>
> - if (((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) || unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
> - && !in_interrupt()) {
> - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) {
>
At what point was this code deleted?
If it still exists, then I like the idea of this patch anyway. It takes
more code out of the loop. We end up checking if __GFP_WAIT is set twice,
but no major harm in that.
> has been replaced with a slightly weaker one:
>
> + if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS) {
>
> we need to ensure we don't recurse when PF_MEMALLOC is set
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1658,16 +1658,6 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_m
> return page;
> }
>
> -static inline int is_allocation_high_priority(struct task_struct *p,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask)
> -{
> - if (((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) || unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
> - && !in_interrupt())
> - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
> - return 1;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * This is called in the allocator slow-path if the allocation request is of
> * sufficient urgency to ignore watermarks and take other desperate measures
> @@ -1702,6 +1692,44 @@ void wake_all_kswapd(unsigned int order,
> wakeup_kswapd(zone, order);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * get the deepest reaching allocation flags for the given gfp_mask
> + */
> +static int gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *p = current;
> + int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_MIN | ALLOC_CPUSET;
> + const gfp_t wait = gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT;
> +
> + /*
> + * The caller may dip into page reserves a bit more if the caller
> + * cannot run direct reclaim, or if the caller has realtime scheduling
> + * policy or is asking for __GFP_HIGH memory. GFP_ATOMIC requests will
> + * set both ALLOC_HARDER (!wait) and ALLOC_HIGH (__GFP_HIGH).
> + */
> + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH)
> + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGH;
> +
> + if (!wait) {
> + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
> + /*
> + * Ignore cpuset if GFP_ATOMIC (!wait) rather than fail alloc.
> + * See also cpuset_zone_allowed() comment in kernel/cpuset.c.
> + */
> + alloc_flags &= ~ALLOC_CPUSET;
> + } else if (unlikely(rt_task(p)) && !in_interrupt())
> + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
> +
> + if (likely(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))) {
> + if (!in_interrupt() &&
> + ((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) ||
> + unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))))
> + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
> + }
> +
> + return alloc_flags;
> +}
> +
> static struct page * noinline
> __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> struct zonelist *zonelist, enum zone_type high_zoneidx,
> @@ -1732,48 +1760,34 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, u
> * OK, we're below the kswapd watermark and have kicked background
> * reclaim. Now things get more complex, so set up alloc_flags according
> * to how we want to proceed.
> - *
> - * The caller may dip into page reserves a bit more if the caller
> - * cannot run direct reclaim, or if the caller has realtime scheduling
> - * policy or is asking for __GFP_HIGH memory. GFP_ATOMIC requests will
> - * set both ALLOC_HARDER (!wait) and ALLOC_HIGH (__GFP_HIGH).
> */
> - alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_MIN;
> - if ((unlikely(rt_task(p)) && !in_interrupt()) || !wait)
> - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
> - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH)
> - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGH;
> - if (wait)
> - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CPUSET;
> + alloc_flags = gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_mask);
>
> restart:
> - /*
> - * Go through the zonelist again. Let __GFP_HIGH and allocations
> - * coming from realtime tasks go deeper into reserves.
> - *
> - * This is the last chance, in general, before the goto nopage.
> - * Ignore cpuset if GFP_ATOMIC (!wait) rather than fail alloc.
> - * See also cpuset_zone_allowed() comment in kernel/cpuset.c.
> - */
> + /* This is the last chance, in general, before the goto nopage. */
> page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, nodemask, order, zonelist,
> - high_zoneidx, alloc_flags,
> - preferred_zone,
> - migratetype);
> + high_zoneidx, alloc_flags & ~ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS,
> + preferred_zone, migratetype);
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
>
> /* Allocate without watermarks if the context allows */
> - if (is_allocation_high_priority(p, gfp_mask))
> + if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS) {
> page = __alloc_pages_high_priority(gfp_mask, order,
> - zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask, preferred_zone,
> - migratetype);
> - if (page)
> - goto got_pg;
> + zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask,
> + preferred_zone, migratetype);
> + if (page)
> + goto got_pg;
> + }
>
> /* Atomic allocations - we can't balance anything */
> if (!wait)
> goto nopage;
>
> + /* Avoid recursion of direct reclaim */
> + if (p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
> + goto nopage;
> +
> /* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
> page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order,
> zonelist, high_zoneidx,
>
Looks good eyeballing it here at least. I'll slot it in and see what the
end result looks like but I think it'll be good.
Thanks
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists