| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:15:48 -0500 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> To: Tomas M <tomas@...x.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: New filesystem for Linux kernel On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:13:08AM +0100, Tomas M wrote: > An overview of aufs2 has been submitted to this list. > I noticed zero response at all. Nobody cares? > > I suggest to remove unionfs from Andrew's -mm tree and replace it by aufs2! > Tell me why this should not happen... Um, you need to tell us why aufs2 is better than Unionfs. The burden of proof rests on your shoulders. The code which is displacing existing code needs to give a justification about why it is better than the code which is displacing, not the other way around. > I write this in the hope that a debate will start... As a debate judge might say, you haven't even made your prima facie case yet. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists