[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:52:54 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, riel@...hat.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] Get rid of the concept of hot/cold page freeing
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:40:17AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > > I hope we can get rid of various ugly elements of the quicklists if the
> > > page allocator would offer some sort of support. I would think that the
> >
> > Only if it provides significant advantages over existing quicklists or
> > adds *no* extra overhead to the page allocator common cases. :)
>
> And only if the page allocator gets fast enough to be usable for
> allocs instead of quicklists.
>
It appears the x86 doesn't even use the quicklists. I know patches for
i386 support used to exist, what happened with them?
That aside, I think we could win slightly by just knowing when a page is
zeroed and being freed back to the allocator such as when the quicklists
are being drained. I wrote a patch along those lines but it started
getting really messy on x86 so I'm postponing it for the moment.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists