[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:46:29 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add to_delayed_work macro
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:32:48 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:29:52 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:34:40 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +#define to_delayed_work(_work) container_of(_work, struct delayed_work, work)
> >>
> >> As this is specifically designed to operate on a `struct work*', as
> >> opposed to "any struct which has a field called `work'", we can get
> >> additional type-safety by putting a C interface around it.
> >
> > This is what I wanted to do in the first place, but then I noticed that
> > _all_ such wrappers around container_of are implemented as macros
> > rather than inline functions.
>
> /Almost/ all.
>
> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.28/drivers/firewire/fw-device.h#L73
Ah, I missed that one because it's not named to_<something>, sorry.
> > So I decided to follow the crowd. Any idea why it is so?
>
> Merely old habits.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists