linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] byteorder: add load/store

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:51:24 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] byteorder: add load/store_{endian} API



On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> 
> OK, static inline it is then. Would you be opposed to an API like:
> 
> get_le16
> put_le16
> 
> to match with 
>
> get_unaligned_le16
> put_unaligned_le16
> 
> And make the existing unaligned helpers typesafe?

That sounds much better to me. That said, I'm also wondering what the 
upside is of this all?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/