linux-kernel - Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:12:32 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:39 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> >> Perhaps you could avoid putting such fixes into published 
> >> merge branches.
> [so that consumers of the trees use them only on demand]
> > 
> > Yeah, these commits are in none of the topic branches that are 
> > the git base of development, they are all already in a separate 
> > branch named "tip:out-of-tree".
> 
> So people should remember to retry without out-of-tree before reporting
> problems == remember to report against the development base.

I'll bite, how does a gut-fu white belt accomplish that?

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/