| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:00:12 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> Subject: Re: [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote: >> >>> On latest tip I am getting: >>> >>> [ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 >>> [ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel >>> [ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 >>> [ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel >>> [ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 >>> [ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel >>> >>> But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine. > > No it is also not fine :( for percpu. > >> That's a linker bug - Tejun Cc:-ed. >> > > Problem is basically with 64 bit percpu on 32 bit it is OK. Ahh, Here is > the solution: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/3/129 > > because of commit 8ac83757149 of Tejun Heo. Yeah, patchset almost ready. Please wait a bit more. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists