linux-kernel - Re: Dynamically determine if kernel includes CFS Scheduler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:17:47 -0800
From:	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To:	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"lkml, " <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dynamically determine if kernel includes CFS Scheduler

Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:01:14PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>> So I am of course in agreement with both you and Peter.  In this case, 
>> the development team of an existing product is trying to move away from 
>> heavy use of sched_yield(), and the CFS scheduler provides some 
> 
> Hmm. The only thing I'll say about checking kernel versions is: do some
> tests/checks with the different enterprise distro kernels. I don't think
> they tend to do big backports any more but if they have that kernel
> version check could become tricky...

Right, excellent point.  Regardless of how thing are right now, relying 
on the kernel revision is a bad idea for this reason.

-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/