lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:54:24 GMT
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: documentation 1Q09 update

Commit-ID:  26fe8c643f7ca90e3d9ee2bf3c5d3d83cca650ec
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/26fe8c643f7ca90e3d9ee2bf3c5d3d83cca650ec
Author:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 16:11:38 -0800
Commit:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:53:04 +0100

rcu: documentation 1Q09 update

Update the RCU documentation to call out the need for callers of
primitives like call_rcu() and synchronize_rcu() to prevent subsequent
RCU readers from hazard.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
LKML-Reference: <20090308001138.GA15335@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
index 6e25340..accfe2f 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
@@ -298,3 +298,15 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 
 	Note that, rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() relate to
 	SRCU just as they do to other forms of RCU.
+
+15.	The whole point of call_rcu(), synchronize_rcu(), and friends
+	is to wait until all pre-existing readers have finished before
+	carrying out some otherwise-destructive operation.  It is
+	therefore critically important to -first- remove any path
+	that readers can follow that could be affected by the
+	destructive operation, and -only- -then- invoke call_rcu(),
+	synchronize_rcu(), or friends.
+
+	Because these primitives only wait for pre-existing readers,
+	it is the caller's responsibility to guarantee safety to
+	any subsequent readers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ