lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:14:08 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Balaji Rao <balajirrao@...il.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuacct: per-cgroup utime/stime statistics - v1

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:04:34 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > This patch adds a new file cpuacct.stat which displays two stats:
> > > utime and stime. I wasn't too sure about the usefulness of providing
> > > per-cgroup guest and steal times and hence not including them here.
> > > 
> > > Note that I am using percpu_counter for collecting these two stats.
> > > Since percpu_counter subsystem doesn't protect the readside, readers could
> > > theoritically obtain incorrect values for these stats on 32bit systems.
> > 
> > Using percpu_counter_read() means that .. but is it okay to ignore "batch"
> > number ? (see FBC_BATCH)
> >
> 
> FBC_BATCH? Thats gone..no? We have dynamic batches now, IIRC. Could
> you please elaborate on your comment?
>  
Ah, ok. it's now extern int percpu_counter_batch.

-Kame

> > 
> > > I hope occasional wrong values is not too much of a concern for
> > > statistics like this. If it is a problem, we have to either fix
> > > percpu_counter or do it all by ourselves as Kamezawa attempted
> > > for cpuacct.usage (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/4/14)
> > > 
> > Hmm, percpu_counter_sum() is bad ?
> > 
> 
> Yes, but we need to sum somewhere..  user space summing will not be
> atomic, we'll get several snapshots of per CPU data and summing it
> might not yield the correct answers.
> 
> > BTW, I'm not sure but don't we need special handling if
> > CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y ?
> 
> Good point. Bharata, with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, utime and stime
> is accounted for within the architecture.
> 
> -- 
> 	Balbir
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists