linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86: make e820_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:04:56 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86: make e820_update_range() handle small range
	update


* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Commit-ID:  78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
> >>>> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
> >>>> Author:     Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> >>>> AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:36:01 -0700
> >>>> Commit:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> >>>> CommitDate: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:20:07 +0100
> >>>>
> >>>> x86: make e820_update_range() handle small range update
> >>>>
> >>>> Impact: enhance e820 code to handle more cases
> >>>>
> >>>> Try to handle new range which could be covered by one entry.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> >>>> Cc: jbeulich@...ell.com
> >>>> LKML-Reference: <49B9F0C1.10402@...nel.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> >>> -tip testing found a bootup crash + reboot due to this patch.
> >>>
> >>> config attached. The bootup crashes here:
> >>>
> >>> [    0.000000] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
> >>> [    0.000000]   0 base 0000000000 mask FFC0000000 write-back
> >>> [    0.000000]   1 disabled
> >>> [    0.000000]   2 disabled
> >>> [    0.000000]   3 disabled
> >>> [    0.000000]   4 disabled
> >>> [    0.000000]   5 disabled
> >>> [    0.000000]   6 disabled
> >>> [    0.000000]   7 disabled
> >>> [    0.000000] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
> >>> [    0.000000]   get_mtrr: cpu0 reg00 base=0000000000 size=0000040000 write-back
> >>> [    reboot  ]
> >>>
> >> what does the e820 map look like?
> > 
> > [    0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f800 (usable)
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 000000000009f800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fff0000 (usable)
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 000000003fff0000 - 000000003fff3000 (ACPI NVS)
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 000000003fff3000 - 0000000040000000 (ACPI data)
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
> > [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
> > 
> 
> it seems that patch revealed the bug in 
> setup_bios_corruption_check

Cool. I'm wondering, could this explain:

   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12645

?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/