| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:09:54 +0100 From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de> To: Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] lis3: solve dependency between core and ACPI Hi, On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:43:50AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Éric Piel wrote: > > Daniel Mack schreef: > > > This solves the dependency between lis3lv02d.[ch] and ACPI specific > > > methods. It introduces a ->bus_priv pointer to the device struct which > > > is casted to 'struct acpi_device' in the ACIP layer. Changed hp_accel.c > > > accordingly. > > > > > > This also moves the read_8() and read_16() routines from hp_accel.c to > > > lis3lv02d.c as they are not specific to ACPI. > > Hello, > > I've tried the patch series on my laptop. This particular patch burst > > the driver... need some work :-) The values are not read correctly and > > the IRQ is not detected. See down in the code... > > Ok, obvious fixes. I'll post a new set of the three topmost patches - > could you test them again, please? Could anyone test that on hardware which has a lis3 chip? I'd like to avoid missing the next merge window for this :) Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists