linux-kernel - Re: [v3 PATCH 2/4] timers: Identifying the existing pinned timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:07:44 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, ego@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	andi@...stfloor.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
	vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, arjan@...radead.org,
	svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 2/4] timers: Identifying the existing pinned timers

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
> * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-03-16 16:40:45]:
> 
> The following pinned hrtimers have been identified and marked:
> 1)sched_rt_period_timer
> 2)tick_sched_timer
> 3)stack_trace_timer_fn

How did you verify that these are the only timers which need to be
pinned ?

Can we be sure that there is no code which relies on the current
behaviour to keep functionality tied together ? Networking and block
layer comes to mind.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/