lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:13:34 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, joerg.roedel@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: AMD Quad core - PCI-DMA: Out of IOMMU space on > 4 GB RAM

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:15:37 -0700
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> I've run into "PCI-DMA: Out of IOMMU space" messages after loading and
>> unloading a module 30 times. The interesting thing is this only
>> happens if I have > 4 GB of memory. The box this occurs has AMD Phenom
>> quad core CPU so I take it a harware IOMMU is being used. Below are
>> example relevant messages with > 4 GB and then < 4 GB of memory. The
>> driver I tested this with was ath9k. It could be an issue perhaps with
>> ath9k but I am unable to find an issue in our probe/removal.
>>
>> Could this be an issue with the AMD IOMMU used? Or is it more likely a
>> driver issue?
>
> ath9k wants DMA_32BIT_MASK, right? If so, GART IOMMU does nothing on a
> system with < 4GB memory since ath9k can access to all the memory
> addresses directly. With >4GB memory, GART needs to remap an address
> higher than 4GB because ath9k wants DMA_32BIT_MASK.
>
> From a quick look, ath9k doesn't call pci_unmap_single for rx
> buffers. Though I might be wrong because I don't know anything about
> the driver.

You seem to be right actually, we were calling pci_unmap_single() for
rx buffers on the RX tasklet but never for the simple case of removing
the module. Will test it out in a bit.

 Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ