linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:15:51 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	"Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU

On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 10:47 +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
> If it's possible, I'd like it go through the PCI tree because the ATS 
> depends on the SR-IOV. This dependency is not reflected in this v3 
> series since the SR-IOV is not in-tree and I don't want to break the 
> build after people apply the ATS on their tree.

In what way will it depend on SR-IOV?

> So Dave, can I get an ack from you and let Jesse pull the IOMMU change
> to his tree? Or let this ATS go to 2.6.31?

Want to show the latest version of the patches which depend on SR-IOV,
and I can ack them?

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/