| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:55:09 +0900 From: hooanon05@...oo.co.jp To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC Aufs2 #3 2/2] split 'xino' entry under sysfs Greg KH: > Really? Try leaving them out for now and see if anyone notices :) Ok, then I will move them to debugfs. Does the rule "one value per file" applied to debugfs too? > Do you really need to print these paths? And are they going to bigger > than PATH_MAX? Printing is necessary, and PATH_MAX will be sufficient. I just wanted to forbid over-running when the path is incredibly longer. J. R. Okajima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists